Estimated reading time: 12 minutes

B Sudershan Reddy’s Vice President Bid: Confidence in Cross-Party Support and Upholding the Constitution

The Vice Presidential election in India is set for September 9, 2025, following the unexpected resignation of incumbent Jagdeep Dhankhar due to health reasons. This election is a significant event, as the Vice President holds a key constitutional role, acting as the Rajya Sabha’s Chairperson and stepping in as the President if required.

B Sudershan Reddy, a respected former Supreme Court judge and Chief Justice of the Gauhati High Court, has been nominated by the opposition INDIA bloc as their candidate. With a long legal career and a reputation as a constitutional expert, Reddy’s bid is marked by his call to uphold democratic values and the Constitution amid rising political challenges. This contest sees him face off against the ruling alliance’s nominee, reflecting a politically charged atmosphere heading into the vote.

For a clear understanding of the process and the emerging candidates, this post will outline the upcoming election’s key details and what Reddy’s candidacy means in this crucial political contest.

Watch here on YouTube for more insights

B Sudershan Reddy’s Vision and Constitutional Commitment

B Sudershan Reddy brings to the Vice President’s office a vision deeply rooted in respect for the Constitution and the responsibilities it demands. With decades of experience as a Supreme Court judge, his approach to this constitutional post reflects the precision, fairness, and moral clarity expected of a top judicial figure. His campaign carries a message that goes beyond politics, focusing squarely on upholding the democratic fabric of India through the pillars of legality, morality, and impartial governance.

Commitment to Constitutional Values and Integrity

Reddy has made it clear that the Vice Presidency is not just a ceremonial role for him; it’s a position that calls for a guardian of the Constitution. He emphasises that fairness and impartiality must guide every decision, much like how judges approach their duty to dispense unbiased justice. For Reddy, the oath he takes is a promise to protect the Constitution’s principles with unwavering integrity.

He stresses the importance of upholding constitutional conventions—those unwritten practices that ensure the proper functioning of democracy alongside legal provisions. This approach, grounded in tradition and respect for established norms, is intended to maintain political stability and preserve public trust in constitutional offices.

A Liberal Constitutional Democrat

Reddy identifies as a liberal constitutional democrat, which in his terms means protecting individual freedoms while respecting the larger social and economic objectives laid down in the Constitution. He believes the Vice President should be a unifying figure who transcends party loyalties and stands firm on legal and ethical grounds.

His outlook is that democracy thrives when constitutional guardians hold to the letter and spirit of the law, no matter the political pressures. This means safeguarding fundamental rights, promoting social justice, and ensuring equality without partiality. In essence, he sees the Constitution as a living framework that must guide political and social behaviour fairly and transparently.

Balancing Law with Moral Responsibility

One of the standout features of Reddy’s vision is how he blends legal responsibility with a high moral code. He understands the Vice President’s role as a custodian who must reflect the highest standards of honesty and probity. His career in the judiciary has honed his belief that law and morality are intertwined, not separate.

He plans to ensure the office exercises its powers with restraint, respect for diversity, and a sincere effort to maintain the dignity of constitutional institutions. This measured approach is designed to encourage dialogue, protect constitutional democracy, and act as a check against any potential misuse of authority.

B Sudershan Reddy’s promise to uphold these values has struck a chord across the opposition and has the potential to gain support from diverse parties looking to protect India’s constitutional democracy in uncertain times. His career lends confidence that he would treat the Vice President’s office with the seriousness and respect it deserves.

For more insights into his commitment to constitutional values and his approach as a judicial mind in politics, you can read details in this Times of India profile on Reddy’s constitutional stance.

Cross-Party Support and Electoral Strategy

The Vice President election in 2025 is shaping up to be a contest not just between the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and the opposition INDIA bloc but also a test of cross-party support beyond traditional affiliations. B Sudershan Reddy’s candidacy leverages his reputation as a constitutional expert to attract votes across party lines despite the numerical odds stacked against the opposition. Understanding the electoral math alongside coalition dynamics reveals how surprises could still turn the tide in this closely watched race.

Numerical Challenges and Potential Surprises in Voting

The Vice President is elected by an electoral college of 782 members, comprising all elected and nominated Members of Parliament from both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. To secure the post, a candidate must earn a simple majority — at least 392 votes out of 782.

The ruling NDA currently holds a firm majority with 293 seats in the Lok Sabha and 133 in the Rajya Sabha, amounting to 426 members combined. This majority typically offers candidate C.P. Radhakrishnan a comfortable position going into the elections. On paper, NDA’s strength appears decisive; however, elections rarely follow straightforward arithmetic.

Opposition candidate B Sudershan Reddy’s path to victory depends not only on the INDIA bloc’s backing but also on gaining support from outside traditional opposition ranks. This includes:

• Independent MPs and smaller parties who may be persuaded by Reddy’s focus on constitutional values rather than partisan politics.
• Members of the NDA who may feel sidelined or disagree with their leadership’s choice, potentially voting against the party line.

Such rebellion within the NDA could shift expected outcomes dramatically. A handful of cross-voting MPs would inject uncertainty, signalling that numbers alone do not guarantee results.

Moreover, the INDIA bloc’s strategy hinges on uniting diverse parties, including regional groups often torn about their alignment. The election is, thus, a tightrope walk where alliances, personal influence, and appeal beyond party politics matter as much as raw seat counts.

The balance of power in such elections often hinges on how well candidates reach out to MPs who may prioritize principles over party diktats, making Reddy’s cross-party appeal critical.

The NDA’s Parliamentary Majority and Its Impact

NDA’s combined strength of 426 MPs grants a cushion over the 392-vote threshold. This dominance reflects its firm hold over Indian Parliament but does not assure a guaranteed win without challenges. Internal unity becomes a critical factor.

• NDA’s Cohesion: The alliance’s members are usually expected to follow party lines, but cracks within any coalition can result in surprises.
• Party discipline: BJP and its allies command strong influence, yet the office of the Vice President is often seen with a degree of independence, allowing MPs to exercise personal discretion.

Political observers point out that if even a fraction of NDA MPs break ranks due to personal loyalty to Reddy or to uphold constitutional concerns, the election could see unexpected swings. This possibility keeps both camps alert, pushing Reddy’s camp to intensify cross-party lobbying.

Possibility of NDA Rebellion Supporting Reddy

Though the NDA’s numbers are robust, former Supreme Court judge B Sudershan Reddy’s appeal lies in his non-political image and credibility on constitutional matters. This helps him reach out to NDA members who might question party directives on ethical grounds.

Key factors encouraging potential rebellion among NDA MPs include:

• Reddy’s legal stature commands respect beyond political divisions.
• Some MPs may prioritise the constitutional dignity of the Vice President’s office over factional allegiance.
• The opposition’s narrative framing the vote as a stand for democracy and rule of law could resonate with independents or dissatisfied members.

This dynamic makes the contest an unpredictable affair and underscores why Reddy remains confident despite lacking the numbers initially.

Strategic Regional Outreach and Party Alignments

Reddy’s campaign has focused heavily on building support from regional parties and MPs, especially in Telugu-speaking states and the Northeast, areas where the NDA’s grip is less overwhelming.

• Telangana and Andhra Pradesh: Reddy hails from Telangana, which gives him an edge in outreach to regional parties like Telangana Rashtra Samithi (BRS). Though BRS hasn’t publicly declared support, pressure and regional pride keep their options open.
• YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) and Telugu Desam Party (TDP): These parties present a complex picture. The YSRCP has expressed loyalty to the NDA candidate, but Reddy has engaged with party leaders, hoping for softer positions or influencing MPs who might vote independently. TDP’s stance is delicate given its alliance history with NDA and ties to Reddy’s home region.
• Northeast States: MPs from Assam, Manipur, and Nagaland—regions where local issues often trump national alliances—could swing their votes based on outreach and Reddy’s emphasis on constitutional responsibility and national unity.

The INDIA bloc, along with support from the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and several independents, is actively canvassing MPs beyond its core alliance. This ambitious cross-party effort aims to chip away at the NDA majority by convincing MPs that the Vice President’s role must transcend politics.

In summary, while the numbers suggest an uphill battle for B Sudershan Reddy, the combination of his constitutional stature, strategic regional outreach, and the potential for some NDA members to defy party lines keeps the election very much alive with the possibility of surprises.

For more insights on the complex dynamics of this election, see this detailed coverage by The Hindu on Sudershan Reddy’s cross-party approach.

This analysis highlights the tightrope walk in Indian parliamentary politics and the influential role individuals with respect and credibility can play in even heavily numbers-driven contests.

Addressing Regional and Ideological Perceptions in the VP Contest

In any election involving a high-profile constitutional post like the Vice President’s, regional loyalties and ideological leanings often colour public conversations and political narratives. B Sudershan Reddy’s candidacy has sparked discussion, especially regarding the so-called “South versus South” angle against NDA’s candidate C.P. Radhakrishnan. Reddy, however, pushes back firmly against this view, insisting the contest should centre on qualifications and constitutional commitment rather than geography or party labels. Let’s unpack how he addresses these perceptions and frames the election as a contest of constitutional principles over regional or political divides.

Rejecting the ‘South vs South’ Narrative

B Sudershan Reddy dismisses the idea that this election is a battle between southern states vying for representation. The implication that the contest is about region rather than merit reduces a momentous constitutional election to mere territorial rivalry. For Reddy, this reduction misses the point entirely.

He stresses that the Vice President’s office demands an individual who commands respect for upholding constitutional values across the nation, regardless of where they hail from. This stance is a call to focus on what really matters:

• Expertise in constitutional law and governance
• Integrity and impartiality
• Ability to act as a unifying figure transcending regional loyalties

By brushing aside the “South vs South” framing, Reddy redirects attention toward national responsibility and solemn duty rather than regional pride.

Image showing India’s southern region with constitutional symbols, highlighting the focus on merit beyond geography. Image created with AI.

Distancing from Party Affiliations While Acknowledging Politics

While Reddy clearly steps away from active party politics, he recognises that the Vice President’s position exists within a political framework. The Constitution itself is both a legal and political document, reflecting the will of elected representatives. Reddy strikes a balance in saying:

• He stands independent of political parties but values the democratic process.
• His commitment is to the Constitution’s spirit, not to any political agenda.
• The election, while political, must prioritise constitutional dignity and impartiality above party games.

This nuanced position helps him appeal to MPs and political leaders who may be wary of hard-line partisanship but recognise the need for a Vice President who respects political realities without being consumed by them.

Ideological Dimensions: Upholding Constitutional Democracy

This election reflects an ongoing ideological struggle about the nature of India’s democracy and constitutional governance. Reddy’s candidacy represents more than just opposition politics; it embodies a vision where:

• The Constitution is the ultimate guide, not political expediency.
• Constitutional democracy demands respect for diversity, rule of law, and checks on power.
• Personal and political loyalties should not override the Vice President’s constitutional responsibilities.

Reddy’s emphasis on these values invites parliamentarians from all sides to prioritise safeguarding democratic institutions. He projects the Vice President as a guardian of constitutional democracy, standing above partisan rivalries to protect India’s democratic foundations.

Key Takeaways on Addressing Perceptions

Reddy’s fresh approach to tackling regional and ideological perceptions centres on three clear points:

1. Merit Over Region: Qualifications and character should define the election, not geography.
2. Political Awareness Without Partisanship: Recognising politics but maintaining independence.
3. Constitution First: The Vice President’s role must reinforce constitutional democracy above all else.

By putting these principles front and centre, Sudershan Reddy fosters a focus on what truly matters in such a constitutional election. His stance encourages voters and MPs to look beyond dividing lines and consider the long-term health of India’s democracy.

For further insight into the complexity of politics surrounding the VP poll and Reddy’s positioning, the Assam Tribune’s coverage offers detailed analysis, reflecting the regional dynamics in play.

Conclusion

B Sudershan Reddy’s Vice Presidential bid stands out for its firm commitment to constitutional values and impartiality, qualities he brings from a long and respected judicial career. His confidence in securing cross-party support reflects a call to MPs to look beyond party lines and focus on the integrity and dignity the office demands.

This election is not merely a political contest but a test of how serious India is about safeguarding its democratic traditions through a Vice President who respects the Constitution first. Given the electoral dynamics and regional factors, Reddy’s candidacy highlights the possibility that principles and merit can influence votes more than mere numbers.

For anyone following Indian politics, this is a moment to appreciate the Vice President’s role beyond regional or party loyalties, underlining how constitutional duty and fairness should guide such high offices. The coming days will reveal whether this approach resonates widely enough to shape the future of Indian parliamentary democracy.