Estimated reading time: 13 minutes

AAP MLA Mehraj Malik Detained Under PSA After Clashing with Doda DM: What Happened and What’s Next

AAP MLA Mehraj Malik’s detention under the Public Safety Act (PSA) in Doda has stirred significant political unrest in Jammu and Kashmir. The incident follows his alleged use of abusive language against the District Magistrate, Harvinder Singh, leading to heightened tensions in the region. This is the first time a sitting MLA in the area has been booked under the PSA, a law allowing preventive detention without trial.

Malik’s arrest has sparked strong reactions from political leaders who criticize the move as an attempt to silence dissent. The situation reflects the ongoing challenges in local governance and law enforcement, especially against the backdrop of recent political shifts in Jammu and Kashmir. Understanding this case sheds light on the fragile state of democracy and political expression in the region today.

Watch a video related to the event here: #Watch: MLA Mehraj Malik allegedly put under house arrest at Dak Bungalow, Doda

What Led to Mehraj Malik’s Arrest?

Understanding what triggered Mehraj Malik’s arrest helps reveal how political tensions and law enforcement intersect in Jammu and Kashmir. His detention under the Public Safety Act (PSA) didn’t happen overnight; it was the result of a series of events involving heated exchanges, viral videos, and concerns surrounding public order.

The Incident with District Magistrate Harvinder Singh

The core issue began when Malik, a sitting MLA, reportedly directed abusive and inappropriate language at Doda’s District Magistrate, Harvinder Singh. This interaction happened during an official event and was not just a private disagreement. Malik’s remarks crossed a line because they were aimed at an administrative officer performing his duties. This created a direct challenge to authority and respect within government functions.

Viral Videos Sparked Public Attention

The issue escalated quickly after videos of the confrontation surfaced on social media platforms. These clips showed Malik verbally clashing with the DM, which caused a strong reaction from the authorities and the public alike. The viral nature of these videos amplified the incident far beyond Doda, leading to swift government action.

Social media transformed a local dispute into a widely discussed public matter. The videos prompted authorities to take seriously the potential impact on law and order. When tensions escalate in a sensitive region like Jammu and Kashmir, even a single incident can trigger wider unrest, prompting preventive measures.

Official Grounds for FIR and PSA Charges

Following these events, police registered a First Information Report (FIR) against Malik, citing charges that stemmed from his language and behavior toward the District Magistrate. The FIR accused him of using intimidating and abusive language capable of disturbing peace.

The police, taking these actions seriously, pushed for his detention under the Public Safety Act. The PSA allows preventive detention when authorities believe there is a risk to public order or security. In Malik’s case, the government argued that his comments were not just offensive but also posed a threat by potentially triggering unrest.

Why Authorities Treated Malik’s Comments as a Serious Issue

In a region like Jammu and Kashmir, maintaining public order is fragile. Officials perceived Malik’s conduct as more than just heated words—it was considered a challenge to the administrative system and a possible spark for wider conflict. Following local laws, dissent can cross into actions that impact peace and safety, especially when directed toward key government figures.

The use of PSA here indicates the seriousness with which authorities viewed the incident. It shows how political figures’ actions are monitored closely, and any behavior seen as potentially disruptive faces strict consequences.

The arrest of Mehraj Malik marks a rare example of a sitting MLA being detained under PSA, signaling the fine line political leaders in the region walk between expression and lawfulness.

For more insights on this unfolding situation, you can check detailed reports from Aaj Tak’s coverage of the Mehraj Malik case that highlight the official statements and public reactions.

Political Background: Mehraj Malik and AAP in Jammu & Kashmir

The rise of Mehraj Malik as a prominent political figure in Jammu and Kashmir marks a significant milestone for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). Malik’s 2024 election victory in the Doda constituency broke new ground for AAP, establishing its first foothold in the Union Territory. Beyond just a win, Malik’s journey highlights the complex and often confrontational relationship between the new political player and the region’s administration.

Previous Controversies Involving Malik

Mehraj Malik’s political career in Jammu and Kashmir has frequently been marked by confrontations with officials and sharp criticism of the local administration. His bold statements and actions have not gone unnoticed, often stirring controversy and attracting governmental scrutiny.

Some of the key moments that have set the tone for Malik’s current predicament include:

• Repeated Criticism of Officials: Malik has publicly accused district-level authorities, including Deputy Commissioners, of corruption and favoritism. He has not hesitated to call out what he perceives as administrative negligence or malpractice, sometimes using strong, direct language that challenges official narratives.
• Health Centre Relocation Controversy: In 2025, Malik was booked for allegedly removing medical equipment and drugs from a government-run health centre in Kencha village, Doda. He opposed the official decision to relocate the facility to a government-approved site, accusing officials of corruption and pushing an alternative plan favored by local residents. This episode, livestreamed on social media, demonstrated Malik’s willingness to confront administration decisions head-on and mobilize public opinion.
• Calls for Protests and Strikes: Malik has been known to encourage public demonstrations and strikes to protest administrative actions, particularly those he views as unjust or harmful to constituents. These calls have sometimes been seen as attempts to disrupt government procedures, heightening tensions.
• Language and Conduct Issues: Prior to his latest detention, Malik was involved in incidents where videos showed him verbally abusing administrative officers, including the current Deputy Commissioner of Doda, Harvinder Singh. These incidents have contributed to official concerns about maintaining law and order in a volatile region.

Looking at these instances together, the clash that led to Malik’s detention under the Public Safety Act (PSA) fits into a broader pattern of his combative stance toward the Jammu and Kashmir administration. His aggressive approach has made him a thorn in the side of many officials, leading to legal and political confrontations.

While his critics accuse him of undermining governance through unruly conduct and provocative statements, supporters argue Malik is a vocal advocate for accountability and transparency in a system many see as opaque and corrupt.

This background sheds light on how Malik’s political style reflects the delicate balance of power, dissent, and governance in Jammu and Kashmir today — with his actions continuing to influence politics in the region well beyond his election win.

Image showing political tension in Jammu and Kashmir with protesters and officials. 

For more context on Mehraj Malik’s controversies and political career, see reports like AAP’s Jammu and Kashmir MLA Mehraj Malik booked for removing equipment from Doda health centre and AAP MLA Mehraj Malik detained in Doda over abusive language row.

Public Safety Act (PSA): What It Means and Its Use Here

The Public Safety Act (PSA) of Jammu and Kashmir is one of the region’s most debated laws when it comes to maintaining order and security. Often described as a preventive detention law, the PSA lets the authorities detain individuals without formal charges or trial for a period of up to two years. This law acts like a powerful tool for the government to act swiftly if someone is seen as a threat to public order or state security. But it has also drawn criticism due to the limits it imposes on legal safeguards and personal freedoms.

What Is the Public Safety Act?

Originally enacted in 1978, the PSA was designed to prevent activities that could disturb peace or threaten the security of Jammu and Kashmir. Unlike ordinary laws that require formal charges and a court trial to arrest someone, the PSA allows detentions based on the belief that a person might harm public safety. This means detention can happen without filing an FIR or holding a trial immediately.

Key points of the PSA include:

• Detention can last up to two years for those considered a threat to state security.
• For cases impacting public order, detention can extend to one year.
• The decision for detention is often made by government officers such as District Magistrates or Divisional Commissioners, usually backed by police or intelligence reports.
• Detainees don’t have automatic rights to private legal counsel before the Advisory Board, which reviews the detention.
• The Act includes control over “prohibited places” and restricts the spread of materials that might disturb peace.

How the PSA Works in Practice

After a detention under the PSA, an Advisory Board—usually made up of judges—reviews the case within a short window. But this review focuses more on the process rather than the actual merits of the detention. The detainee’s ability to challenge the detention is limited, and courts rarely overturn these orders unless procedural lapses are found.

The PSA essentially acts like a safety valve for authorities in a tense region such as Jammu and Kashmir, where unrest can escalate quickly. The aim is to prevent acts before they happen instead of reacting after the fact. However, this broad and preventive power has often been questioned by human rights organizations.

Use of PSA in Mehraj Malik’s Case

In the situation involving AAP MLA Mehraj Malik, the PSA was invoked due to concerns that his alleged abusive language and confrontation with the District Magistrate could disrupt peace and public order. Given the sensitive nature of Jammu and Kashmir’s environment, authorities viewed his behavior as more than mere words—it was seen as a potential trigger for unrest.

Malik’s detention under the PSA highlights how this law is still in active use against political figures whose actions are judged to pose a significant threat. It reflects the fine balance between maintaining public order and protecting individual rights in a region prone to political tensions.

Reactions from Legal Experts and Political Observers

Legal experts often point out that while the PSA is aimed at security, it can be a double-edged sword. According to several reports (like this Vajiram & Ravi detailed overview), the PSA’s powers can sometimes bypass due process, making it prone to misuse and arbitrary detentions.

Human rights organizations, such as Amnesty International, have criticized the PSA for violating international human rights standards, especially around the right to legal representation and fair trial (Amnesty report). They argue that preventive detention laws like PSA can suppress dissent and political opposition under the guise of public safety.

On the other hand, supporters of the PSA insist it is necessary for a region like Jammu and Kashmir, where maintaining law and order is extremely challenging. They see it as a vital tool to prevent violence and protect citizens from actions that could destabilize the area.

Image showing an infographic about the Public Safety Act (PSA) in India, highlighting law enforcement and governance. Image created with AI.

To understand more about the PSA’s history, powers, and debates surrounding it, you can view a comprehensive summary on Vajiram & Ravi’s Public Safety Act overview. This explains the key provisions and legal mechanism that govern this law in Jammu and Kashmir.

Reactions: AAP, Authorities, and Community Response

The detention of AAP MLA Mehraj Malik in Doda has triggered a swirl of reactions across political lines, the local administration, and the community. This incident, involving the use of the Public Safety Act (PSA), hasn’t just raised questions about legal grounds but has also echoed in public sentiment and political discourse. Let’s break down how the key stakeholders have responded since Malik’s detention.

AAP’s Stand and Political Response

The Aam Aadmi Party has been vocal, both publicly and through party sources, in condemning the detention of Mehraj Malik. The party views this action as an attempt to suppress dissent and silence a critical voice in the region. While official statements assert that Malik was unjustly targeted for standing up against administrative negligence, insider hints suggest concerns that the government is trying to stifle opposition ahead of upcoming political activities.

• Party leaders emphasized Malik’s role as a vocal advocate for the people of Doda.
• They criticized the government for using the PSA against an elected representative, calling it an excessive response to a political disagreement.
• Social media posts and public rallies organized by AAP supporters highlighted themes of resistance to administrative oppression, pitching Malik as a symbolic figure for democratic rights in Jammu and Kashmir.

This reaction reflects the broader political clash in the region where parties like AAP position themselves as champions of accountability, while authorities prioritize law and order.

Official Statements from Authorities

The district administration and police justified Malik’s detention on clear grounds. Officials reiterated that Malik’s alleged abusive language towards the District Magistrate and subsequent behavior posed a risk to peace and public order in a region that remains sensitive and volatile. In their view:

• The PSA use was a necessary step to prevent any escalation.
• Maintaining respect for government officials and authority figures is critical in keeping administrative processes running smoothly.
• The law-and-order concerns stemming from viral videos showing Malik’s confrontation with the DM justified prompt preventive action.

Authorities also stressed that Malik’s case sets a precedent that no one, not even elected representatives, can overstep legal and social boundaries without consequences.

Security Measures and Community Mood in Doda

Following the detention, there was an immediate ramp-up in security measures across Doda to prevent potential protests or unrest. Policemen in full riot gear patrolled key areas, and checkpoints were set up to monitor gatherings. These steps were aimed at keeping the peace but also painted a tense atmosphere in the town.

Among locals, opinions are mixed but charged:

• Some community members express support for Malik, seeing him as a fighter for local issues who is being silenced unfairly.
• Others worry about the potential for disturbances, preferring calm and strict enforcement to avoid trouble.
• The heightened police presence has created a cautious mood, with many avoiding public demonstrations or outspoken gatherings.

This complex blend of political loyalty, caution, and anticipation captures the current climate in Doda — a microcosm of the ongoing tensions in Jammu and Kashmir.

For further insights on the evolving situation, detailed coverage can be found in reports such as AAP MLA Mehraj Malik Detained in Doda on The Northlines and Jammu And Kashmir’s Lone AAP MLA Mehraj Malik Detained Under PSA on News18.

Conclusion

Mehraj Malik’s detention under the Public Safety Act marks a significant moment in Jammu and Kashmir politics, highlighting tensions between elected representatives and the administration. His arrest raises clear questions about how dissent and political speech are balanced against efforts to maintain public order in a sensitive region. As the first sitting MLA to face PSA detention here, Malik’s case could set new precedents for handling political disagreements.

The incident reflects growing friction around free expression, legal limits on protest, and the government’s approach to opposition voices. Moving forward, it’s important to watch how AAP navigates this challenge, how the administration handles dissent, and whether political space in Jammu and Kashmir expands or contracts. This case reminds us that maintaining law and order while respecting political expression is a delicate, ongoing challenge in the region.