Estimated reading time: 9 minutes

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Pakistan and China Push UNSC to Label Balochistan Liberation Army as Terrorist Group (What It Means for Regional Security)

Pakistan and China have brought a joint request to the United Nations Security Council to designate the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and its Majeed Brigade as terrorist groups. The BLA operates from areas in Afghanistan and has carried out attacks targeting Pakistani and Chinese interests, including deadly assaults on Chinese engineers near Karachi. This push reflects growing concerns over cross-border terrorism and its impact on regional security.

This move is significant because it aims to tighten international sanctions and pressure against the BLA, cutting off support and safe havens. With Pakistan serving as a non-permanent UNSC member and China backing the effort, the designation could reshape counterterrorism efforts in South Asia and beyond.

Who Are the Balochistan Liberation Army and the Majeed Brigade?

The Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) isn’t your typical militant group. Formed in 2000, this separatist organization fights for an independent Balochistan, a resource-rich region split between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan. Their grievance? They believe the Pakistani government exploits Baloch resources while marginalizing the local population.

The BLA’s Goals and Structure

The BLA operates as an insurgent force, blending guerrilla tactics with targeted attacks. They reject Pakistan’s sovereignty over Balochistan, advocating for self-rule through armed struggle. While exact numbers are unclear, they likely have hundreds of fighters with support networks extending into Afghanistan. Their funding comes from smuggling, donations from sympathizers, and possibly external backing, though claims of direct state sponsorship remain unproven.

The group’s structure includes:

Military wing: Carries out ambushes, bombings, and targeted killings against security forces.
Propaganda unit: Spreads messages through social media and underground networks.
Majeed Brigade: The suicide attack squad, named after a fallen BLA fighter.

The Rise of the Majeed Brigade

Formed in 2011, the Majeed Brigade represents the BLA’s most lethal innovation. Unlike traditional suicide bombers, Brigade fighters often wear military uniforms and attack high-security sites with precision. Their primary targets? Security forces and Chinese infrastructure projects, which they view as symbols of “occupation.”

Key attacks linked to the BLA and Majeed Brigade:

2018 attack on Chinese Consulate in Karachi: Three militants stormed the building, killing four.
2021 hotel bombing in Gwadar: A suicide bomber targeted a hotel hosting Chinese investors.
2024 assault on Karachi port: Strike on a facility crucial to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.

Why Global Powers Are Concerned

Pakistan and China argue that the BLA’s cross-border operations destabilize the region. With China investing billions in Balochistan through projects like Gwadar Port, the group’s attacks threaten economic and strategic interests. The U.S. State Department already designates the BLA as terrorists, citing their use of suicide bombers. For Pakistan, the UNSC designation could bring tougher sanctions and international pressure on Afghanistan to curb alleged BLA safe havens.

The BLA isn’t just Pakistan’s problem; it’s a flashpoint for regional security, especially as China deepens its footprint in South Asia. Every attack raises the stakes, pushing global players toward a tougher response.

Why Pakistan and China Have Turned to the United Nations

Pakistan and China have escalated their fight against the BLA by taking it to the UN Security Council. The goal? To formally label the group as a terrorist entity under UNSC’s 1267 Sanctions Committee. This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape—it’s a strategic move to choke the BLA’s finances, travel, and weapons supply at an international level.

China, as a permanent UNSC member, holds veto power and can fast-track approvals, while Pakistan’s non-permanent seat (2025-2026) gives it a platform to push the issue. Their urgency stems from recent BLA attacks on Chinese projects like the Gwadar Port and Pakistan’s China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Both countries argue the BLA’s Afghan bases make it a cross-border threat requiring global action.

The Role of the UNSC 1267 Sanctions Committee

The 1267 Committee was created in 1999 to target Al-Qaeda and later expanded to cover ISIS and affiliates. It operates on consensus: all 15 UNSC members must agree to list a group. If approved, the sanctions are binding on all UN members and include:

Asset freezes: Banks worldwide must block the BLA’s funds.
Travel bans: Members can’t cross international borders.
Arms embargoes: No weapons or military support allowed.

The process isn’t quick. Proposals need evidence—something Pakistan and China have compiled after attacks like the 2024 Karachi Port assault. If listed, the BLA would join groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba, facing global isolation.

For China, this is about protecting billions in CPEC investments. For Pakistan, it’s a chance to pressure Afghanistan over alleged BLA safe havens. The UN’s 1267 listing guidelines show how high the stakes are: once listed, escaping sanctions is nearly impossible.

Global and Regional Reactions to the Joint Initiative

The push by Pakistan and China to designate the BLA as a terrorist group under UNSC sanctions has drawn mixed reactions worldwide. Some nations see it as a necessary step to curb cross-border violence, while others remain cautious about the geopolitical motivations behind the move. Here’s how key players are responding:

The United States and Western Allies

The U.S. has already taken a firm stance against the BLA. In August 2025, the State Department designated the group as a foreign terrorist organization, citing its lethal attacks on civilians and infrastructure. This move aligns with Washington’s broader counterterrorism strategy in South Asia.

Europe has been more measured. While the EU hasn’t officially listed the BLA, several member states have expressed concern over the group’s attacks on Chinese projects. The UK, for example, has quietly supported intelligence-sharing with Pakistan but stops short of full endorsement, likely due to human rights concerns in Balochistan.

Afghanistan’s Stance and the Safe Haven Debate

Pakistan has long accused Afghanistan of harboring BLA militants, a claim Kabul denies. The Taliban government insists it doesn’t support cross-border terrorism, but evidence suggests otherwise. A recent UN report noted “increasing militant movement” along the Pakistan-Afghan border, though it stopped short of directly implicating Afghan authorities.

This tension complicates diplomacy. Pakistan wants Afghanistan to crack down on BLA sanctuaries, but Kabul argues Pakistan’s own military operations fuel unrest. China, caught in the middle, has urged both sides to cooperate—after all, its $60 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) hangs in the balance.

India and Russia: Divergent Views

India has stayed neutral publicly but privately views the BLA as Pakistan’s internal problem. Some analysts suggest Delhi sees the group as a counterweight to Pakistani-backed militants in Kashmir, though India officially denies any ties.
Russia, meanwhile, backs the UNSC proposal. Moscow sees terrorism in South Asia as a broader threat and has growing economic interests in the region, including energy deals with Pakistan.

The Regional Security Dilemma

The BLA’s designation isn’t just about one group—it tests how global powers address insurgencies with complex roots. If the UNSC approves, it could set a precedent for labeling other separatist movements. But if it fails, Pakistan and China may resort to unilateral actions, risking further instability.

For now, all eyes are on the 1267 Committee. Will members reach consensus, or will geopolitical rivalries stall the process? Either way, the outcome will ripple across South Asia.

Potential Consequences and Future Implications

The push to label the BLA and Majeed Brigade as UNSC-sanctioned terrorist groups isn’t just about paperwork. If approved, this decision could reshape security dynamics in South Asia, affecting everything from Chinese infrastructure projects to regional diplomacy. Here’s what’s at stake.

How Sanctions Could Disrupt BLA Operations

UNSC sanctions under the 1267 Committee would hit the BLA where it hurts most: funding and mobility. The group relies on cross-border networks and informal financing to operate. A global designation could:

Freeze assets: Banks worldwide would block BLA-linked transactions, crippling their ability to pay fighters or buy weapons.
Restrict travel: Known members couldn’t cross borders legally, cutting off supply routes from Afghanistan.
Isolate supporters: Countries would face pressure to arrest or expel BLA sympathizers.

The U.S. Treasury’s recent sanctions against the BLA show how effective these measures can be. After the 2025 designation, investigators traced and froze millions in suspected BLA-linked funds.

Impact on Chinese Projects and Regional Security

China’s $60 billion CPEC investments are prime BLA targets. Attacks on Gwadar Port and Karachi have already delayed construction and spooked investors. Sanctions could:

Increase security cooperation: Pakistan might get more international support to guard Chinese sites.
Deter future attacks: With funds drying up, the BLA may struggle to launch complex strikes.

But there’s a flip side. Desperate groups often adapt. If the BLA loses formal funding, it might turn to riskier tactics like kidnapping or drug trafficking. That could spread instability beyond Pakistan’s borders.

The Afghanistan-Pakistan Tinderbox

Pakistan claims the BLA operates from Afghan soil, a charge Kabul denies. If the UNSC approves sanctions:

Pressure mounts on Afghanistan: Pakistan could demand the Taliban crack down on BLA camps.
Risk of escalation: Cross-border raids or drone strikes might increase if diplomacy fails.

A recent UN report noted “growing militant activity” along the border but didn’t explicitly blame Afghanistan. Without proof, the Taliban could dismiss Pakistan’s demands, deepening tensions.

Broader Counterterrorism Implications

This case tests how the world handles separatist groups with local grievances but global reach. Success could:

Set a precedent: Other nations might push to sanction similar movements.
Boost China-Pakistan ties: Shared security goals could strengthen their alliance.

Yet failure might encourage unilateral actions. If the UNSC deadlocks, Pakistan and China could ramp up military operations, risking civilian casualties and more unrest.

The bottom line? Sanctions alone won’t solve Balochistan’s conflict, but they could force the BLA to the negotiating table—or provoke even bloodier tactics. Either way, the region’s security hangs in the balance.

Conclusion

The joint Pakistan-China push to designate the BLA as a terrorist group at the UNSC isn’t just about sanctions—it’s a strategic play with real stakes. By teaming up, these two countries are sending a clear message: cross-border terrorism won’t be tolerated, especially when it threatens critical projects like China’s CPEC.

For Pakistan, this move tightens the noose around a group that’s hit its security forces and infrastructure for years. For China, it’s about safeguarding billions in investments. And globally, it sets a precedent for how the world handles separatist groups with international reach.

The outcome could redefine counterterrorism in South Asia. If approved, the BLA’s funding and mobility take a massive hit. If blocked, tensions could flare as Pakistan and China seek other ways to contain the threat. Either way, regional security hangs in the balance.

What do you think—will this UNSC bid succeed, or will geopolitical divides get in the way?